Top 1000+ Solved Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) MCQ Questions Answer
Q. The Supreme Court has power under Article 32 to issue directions or orders or writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari:
a. only when there is a question of enforcement of a fundamental right
b. when there is a question of internal disputes among communal groups
c. when there is a question of election disputes
d. when there is a question of riotous situation.
Q. Under which one of the following cases the traditional rule of filing petition only by theperson aggrieved except in the case of habeas corpus is relaxed:
a. Trilokchand Moichand v. H.B. Munshi
b. Joginder Nath v. UOI
c. Rabindranath Bose v. UOI
d. Upendra Baxi v. State of UP.
Q. Under Article 32:
a. time limit can be imposed on filing of petitions and so the Indian Limitation Act applies
b. there is no lower and upper limit. The party aggrieved must move the court at the earliest possible time and it is the discretion of the court to decide whether it is reasonable delay or not.
c. time limit can be imposed by council of ministers
d. all of the above.
Q. According to Article 30 ‘minorities’ have the right for the administration of educationalinstitutions:
a. which have been established by them only
b. which not necessarily have not been established by them but belong to their religion or language
c. Article 30 does not speak about minority but deals with Scheduled Tribes only
d. none of the above.
Q. According to Articles 25 and 26, what constitutes an essential part of religion or religious practice is to be decided by the court on the basis of:
a. doctrines of particular religion
b. by referendum
c. by majority
d. by convening a religious meeting.
Q. The fundamental rights as envisaged under Articles 12-35 are:
a. absolutely flexible
b. can be amended
c. not justiciable
d. cannot be amended at all.
Q. Right of disabled employee as equal citizens not to be defeated by their superiors andthey have no right to defeat their lawful rights:
a. Sunil Poddar v. Union Bank of India
b. Mani v. State of Tamil Nadu
c. Bhagwan Dass v. Punjab State Electricity Board
d. None of the above.
Q. In the case of People’s Union for democratic Rights v. UOI:
a. non-payment of minimum wages is violative of Article 21
b. the decision in this case did not hearld for right to live with basic human dignity
c. Article 21 does not envisage right to live with human dignity
d. none of the above.
Q. The protection given to the accused under Article 20(3) against compulsion ‘to be witness’ also includes ordinary documentary and testimonial evidence:
a. the protection given under Article 20(3) is not attracted by the above statement
b. the protection given under Article 20(3) is attracted by the above statement
c. witness means other than an accused to whom protection is not given
d. none of the above.
Q. In case of A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 was foundconflicting with the two Articles:
a. Articles 14 and 17
b. Articles 19 and 21
c. Articles 23 and 25
d. Articles 23 and 32.
Q. Which section of Preventive Detention Act, 1950 was declared ultra vires by the SupremeCourt in case of A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras:
a. Article 17
b. Article 11
c. Article 14
d. Article 19.
Q. In a Calcutta case, Manager of a Bank took security for overdraft from the customer and caused the security to be entered into the books of the banks. The Manager shortly afterwards returned the security to the customer before satisfaction of the overdraft. The fact of return of security was mentioned in the books of accounts.
a. The Manager acted dishonesty under Section 24
b. The customer acted of dishonesty under Section 24
c. both the Manager and the customer acted dishonestly under Section 24
d. Neither of them is guilty
Q. One Mrs. Komai bought a car on the name of her daughter, Kiran, who is a minor, and got the insurance policy transferred on her name (Mrs. Komal). The car met with an accident on two counts and she file for a claim on both the counts, from the insurance agency. She acknowledged the receipt of the money as Kiran. The insurance company her prosecuted under Section 467 of the IPC alleging fraud on the appellant’s part?
a. Mrs. Komal is guilty of forgery because she made the insurance company believed that she is Kiran
b. Mrs. Komal is not guilty of forgery because the said deceit did not secure her any advantage as the entire transaction was that of Mrs. Komal
c. Mrs. Komal is guilty of forgery because she signed all the papers in the name of Kiran
d. Both (A) and (C)
Q. Dishonest misappropriation of property, knowing that it was in possession of a deceased person at his death and that it has not since been in the possession of any person legally entitled to it is dealt under-
a. Section 402 of IPC
b. Section 403 of IPC
c. Section 404 of IPC
d. Section 405 of IPC
Q. 148 Criminal breach of trust is dealt under-
a. Section 406 of IPC
b. Section 407 of IPC
c. Section 408 of IPC
d. Section 409 of IPC