Top 1000+ Solved Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) MCQ Questions Answer
Q. When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of common intention of alleach one of them is liable:
a. As if it was done by each one of them in singular capacity
b. Only for the part each one has done
c. For an abetment to commit the act
d. For an attempt to commit the act
Q. The principal of proximity to crime under criminal law is irrelevant while deciding thehomicide and murder:
a. Culpable homicide and murder
b. Theft and dacoity
c. Kidnapping and abduction
d. Abetment and conspiracy
Q. Which one of the following statements is true in relation to the offence of abetment?
a. It is not necessary that the offence for which abetment is alleged should have been committed
b. Unless an offence is successfully committed, there’s no question of abetment.
c. For the offence of the abetment to be established, the abettor should have been proved to have done something at the time of commission of the offence itself to help its commission
d. A returns a licensed weapon belonging to B on his demand with which B commits a murder A is liable for abetment.
Q. The abetment of offence is completed as soon:
a. The offence abetted has been committed
b. The abetter has incited another person to commit an offence
c. The person abetted has done some overt act towards the commission of the offence
d. All the above acts have been place.
Q. X committed theft in a Government building Z a Chowkidar of the building, kept the gate of the building open with the intention of facilitate X’s safe retreat with the stolen property and thereby facilitated his retreat. Which one of the following statement is correct? Z is:
a. Guilty of abetment of theft by intentional aiding
b. Guilty of they by instigation
c. Not guilty of abetment
d. Guilty of theft
Q. Z with intention to steal ornaments opened Y’s box and found it empty. Which one of the following statements is correct? Z is:
a. Not liable for attempt to commit theft as the box being empty, commission of theft was impossible
b. Not liable for attempt to commit theft as he did not do the penultimate act towards commission of theft
c. Not guilty of attempt to commit theft as he made only preparation to commit theft
d. Guilty of attempt to commit theft as he had an intention to commit theft and did an act towards.
Q. Culpable homicide is not murder if it is committed:
a. With the consent of the victim who has completed 12 years of age
b. With the consent of the victim who has completed 18 years of age
c. When the offender is action under the spell of madness
d. When of offender is acting in anger
Q. Which one of the following statements correctly describes the clauses thirdly of Section 300IPC?
a. Intention to cause bodily injury sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death
b. Knowledge that an act of that kind will be likely to cause death must be proved
c. It must be shown that the accused intended to inflict the very injury that is present
d. Nature of the injury need not be prove
Q. Sedition means.
a. Expressing disapprobation of the measures of the government with a view to obtain their alternation
b. Advocacy of boycott of foreign goods as a means of helping Indian industries.
c. Exciting or attempting to excide haltered towards the government though writing
d. Bringing or attempting to bring the government, into hatred through words, signs or visible representation.
Q. A is invited B for a cup of tea. While B is in the kitchen preparing tea, A finds a golden ring on the table. He picks it up places it somewhere in the room with the intention of dishonestly taking it away some time later. A commits.
a. No offence
b. Extortion
c. Attempt to commit theft
d. Theft.
Q. Which one of the following statements correctly distinguishes theft from extortion?
a. In theft, there is dishonest intention whereas in extortion it is not there.
b. In extortion there is dishonest intention whereas in theft it is not there.
c. In theft, there is dishonest intention, whereas in extortion it is fraudulent intention.
d. In theft there is taking of property whereas in extortion there is delivery of property.
Q. X obtains property form Z by saying that “your child is in the hands of my gang and will beput to death unless you send us ten lac rupees”. X commits
a. Criminal breach of trust
b. Robbery
c. Extortion
d. Theft.
Q. Which one of the following statements correctly defines the offence of criminal breach oftrust?
a. Whoever is entrusted with the dominion of property dishonestly converts it as his property is guilty of criminal breach of trust.
b. Whoever dishonestly misappropriates any property for his own use, is guilty of criminal breach of trust
c. Whoever uses any movable property in violation of law or legal contract commits criminal breach of trust.
d. None of the above.
Q. If Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea is a cardinal principal of criminal law, then which oneof the following statements correctly reflects the above principle?
a. Mens rea is an essential element of a crime and there cannot be a crime with out mens re
b. Criminal liability under Indian Law always implies mens rea
c. To constitute a crime there must be actus reus and mens rea
d. Actus reus is not always necessary to constitute a crime.
Q. Assertion (A): There is either theft or extortion in robbery. Reason (R): Theft or extortion precedes robbery. Direction: The following two items consist of two statements, one labeled the Assertion (A) and the other labeled the Reason (R). You are to examine these two statements carefully and decide if the Assertion A and the Reason R are individually true and if so, whether the Reason is a correct explanation of the Assertion. Select your answers to these items using the codes given below and mark your answer sheet accordingly.
a. Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
b. Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
c. A is true but R is false
d. A is false but R is true.