Top 1000+ Solved Indian Penal Code (IPC 1860) MCQ Questions Answer

From 541 to 555 of 939

Q. A sees B drowning but does not save him. B is drowned. A has committed

a. The offence of murder

b. The offence of abetment of suicide

c. The offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder

d. No offence

  • d. No offence

Q. A has knocked own two teeth of B. A has committed the offence of

a. Grievous hurt

b. Simple hurt

c. Culpable homicide

d. Attempt to hurt

  • a. Grievous hurt

Q. A instigates B to murder C who refuses to do so. A is guilty of

a. No offence

b. Abetment to commit murder

c. Criminal conspiracy

d. Criminal instigation.

  • b. Abetment to commit murder

Q. ‘A’ a foreigner stabbed B another foreigner in a foreign vessel on the high seas. Both A and B were brought to Bombay for treatment where B dies. A is also available in Bombay. Which one of the following propositions is correct in respect of applicability of Indian Penal Code (IPC) to the trial of A?

a. As both the deceased and the accused belong to foreign countries and the occurrence of offence has taken place on the high seas, IPC is not applicable to A and hence he cannot be prosecuted in Indi

b. IPC is absolutely not applicable to a foreigner and hence A cannot be tried in India

c. As the offence is completed in Indian territories and the accused A is available in India, IPC is applicable and he should be tried at Bombay

d. As IPC is applicable to Indians as well as to foreigners, A must be tried in India.

  • a. As both the deceased and the accused belong to foreign countries and the occurrence of offence has taken place on the high seas, IPC is not applicable to A and hence he cannot be prosecuted in India.

Q. Z under the influence of madness, attempts to kill A. A hits Z with an iron rod seriouslyinjuring him. In this context which one of the following propositions is correct?

a. A has not right of private defence since Z is mad

b. A has right of private defence though Z is mad

c. A is guilty of inflicting grievous hurt on Z

d. A is guilty of inflicting simple hurt on Z.

  • b. A has right of private defence though Z is mad

Q. There is a fire in a particular locality. A who sees this fire, pulls down house of others in orderto prevent the conflagration from spreading and with the purpose of saving human life and property. In this case

a. A will be guilty of the offence of mischief as he pulls down houses of others.

b. A will not be criminally liable as he wanted to bring benefit to others.

c. A will not be liable for any offence as he has done it for preventing other more dangerous harms to persons and their properties.

d. A will be guilty as he intentionally caused damage to the property of others.

  • c. A will not be liable for any offence as he has done it for preventing other more dangerous harms to persons and their properties.

Q. A is found guilty of attempt to murder in furtherance of common intention. Under which one ofthe following situations can his offence be proved?

a. A procured the weapon of offence voluntarily

b. The weapon of offence was taken away from A’s house without his knowledge

c. A was made to purchase the weapon of offence under the threat to his own life

d. When the weapon was snatched away from A he did not report the same to police.

  • a. A procured the weapon of offence voluntarily

Q. Which one of the following statements correctly defines the term unlawful assembly?

a. An assembly of five or more persons

b. An assembly of five or more persons armed with lethal weapons

c. An assembly of five or more persons with common object of doing a crime

d. An assembly of two or more persons having some common object of doing a criminal act.

  • c. An assembly of five or more persons with common object of doing a crime

Q. Inducing person with dishonest intention to part with his property by putting him in fear ofphysical injury amounts to an offence of

a. Criminal intimidation

b. Extortion

c. Criminal misappropriation

d. Theft.

  • b. Extortion

Q. What is the difference between Sc. 34 and 149?

a. While active participation is needed in Sec. 34 while not necessary in Sec. 149.

b. Sec. 34 does create specific offence while Sec. 149 does not.

c. Both (a) and (b).

d. None of the above.

  • a. While active participation is needed in Sec. 34 while not necessary in Sec. 149.

Q. Give the correct response?

a. Sec. 34 needs active participation while Sec. 149 does not.

b. Sec. 34 does not create specific offence while Sec. 149 does.

c. Se 34 speaks of common intention while Se149 speaks of common object.

d. All of these.

  • a. Sec. 34 needs active participation while Sec. 149 does not.

Q. To apply Sec. 34 there must be at least :

a. 2 persons.

b. 5 persons.

c. More then two persons.

d. None of the above.

  • a. 2 persons.

Q. Several persons took part in beating a person which caused the death of that person:

a. All of them are guilty of causing murder.

b. All of them are guilty of causing gracious hurt.

c. None of them is guilty of causing murder.

d. All of them are guilty of causing of simple hurt.

  • a. All of them are guilty of causing murder.

Q. There persons A, B and C went to a Post office, B & C entered the Post office and asked PostMaster to hand over Money. C fired pistol at him, he was shot dead.

a. Only C is liable for murder.

b. All of them will be guilty of causing death.

c. Both B & C are liable for murder.

d. None of the above.

  • b. All of them will be guilty of causing death.
Subscribe Now

Get All Updates & News