Top 250+ Solved Indian Evidence Act MCQ Questions Answer
Q. Objections as to the admissibility of a document in evidence
a. can be made at any state during the trial
b. can be made at the first opportunity when the document is tendered in evidence
c. can be raised for the first time in appeal
d. all the above.
Q. A party/person who calls the witness can be permitted to cross-examine the witnessso called by him, as provided
a. under section 152 of evidence act
b. under section 153 of evidence act
c. under section 154 of evidence act
d. under section 155 of evidence act.
Q. Section 162 of Cr PC
a. controls section 157 of evidence act
b. controls section 156 of evidence act
c. both (a) & (b)
d. neither (a) nor (b).
Q. Court questions can be put by virtue of
a. section 164 of evidence act
b. section 165 of evidence act
c. section 166 of evidence act
d. section 167 of evidence act.
Q. Court question under section 165 of Evidence Act can be put to
a. any witness
b. any party
c. both (a) & (b)
d. neither (a) nor (b).
Q. To an answer to a court question, the adverse party
a. has a right to cross-examination as a matter of right
b. has a right to cross-examine only with the permission of the court
c. has no right to cross-examine the witness
d. either (a) or (c).
Q. The right to cross-examine on an answer to court question is available
a. to the adverse party only
b. to the party calling the witness only
c. to either of the parties if the answer is adverse to either of the parties
d. only (a) and not (b).
Q. Under section 41 of Evidence Act the presumption is with respect to
a. judgments in rem when they are inter- parts
b. judgment in rem whether such judgments are inter-partes or not
c. judgments in personam
d. all the above.
Q. The presumption under section 41 of Evidence Act is a
a. "presumption of fact
b. rebuttable presumption of law
c. irrebuttable presumption of law .
d. presumption of fact & law.
Q. Delhi High Court issued guidelines for the protection of witness in
a. neelam katara case (2003)
b. naina sahni case (2007)
c. llphaar cinema case (2005)
d. parliament attack case (2006).
Q. Where there are three different dying declarations, Higher Court is
a. not to uphold the conviction awarded by lower court
b. to uphold the conviction awarded by lower court
c. to go through the circumstantial evidence to uphold the conviction awarded by lower court
d. to rely upon the versions of witnesses to uphold the conviction awarded by lower court.
Q. Zahira Sheikh was prime witness in
a. best bakery case (2004)
b. best bakery retrial case (2006) \
c. sukh ram disproportionate assets case (2005)
d. gujjar killings case (2003).
Q. "Relationship is not a factor to affect credibility of a witness" held by the SupremeCourt in
a. s. sudershan reddy v. state of andhra pradesh, air 2006 sc 2716
b. s]/ed ibrahim v. state of andhra pradesh, air 2004 sc 2596
c. renuka bai v. state of maharashtra, air 2006 sc 3056
d. minu kumari v. state of bihar, air 2006 sc 150.
Q. In which case the Supreme Court held that material evidence and not the number ofwitnesses has to be taken note to ascertain the truth of the allegations made
a. surendra prasad tiwari v. state of uttar pradesh, air 2005 sc 125
b. syed ibrahim v. state of andhnz pradesh, air 2006 sc 2908
c. rajinder v. state of haryana, air 2006 sc 21
d. iagdish murav v. state of llttar pradesh, air 2007 sc 35
Q. Dying declaration can be sole basis of conviction if it inspires full confidence of thecourt. The court should be satisfied
a. that deceased was in a fit state of mind at the time of making the statement
b. that it was not the result of tutoring, prompting or product of imagination
c. that deceased was not in a fit state of mind at the time of making the statement
d. both (a) & (b)