Top 250+ Solved Albano MCQs MCQ Questions Answer

From 136 to 150 of 229

Q. A, B, C & D are the co-owners of a parcel of land. They agreed to orally partition the property. Is the partition valid?

a. The contract of partition is void because it was not put into writing.

b. The contract is unenforceable because it was not put into writing.

c. The contract is valid because a contract can be in any form.

d. The contract is valid and enforceable because in matters of realty, the Statute of Frauds governs only conveyances and leases and partition is not a lease; it is not a conveyance but merely segregation of a property.

  • d. The contract is valid and enforceable because in matters of realty, the Statute of Frauds governs only conveyances and leases and partition is not a lease; it is not a conveyance but merely segregation of a property.

Q. A, B & C are the co-owners of a parcel of land. They leased it to D. For failure to pay the rents, A alone sued D. Will the action prosper?

a. The action will not prosper because B & C are indispensable parties.

b. The action will not prosper because of failure to implead B & C who are real parties in interest.

c. The action will prosper because anyone of the co-owners may sue for ejectment.

d. The action will not prosper because the suit by A is not in representation of the co-ownership.

  • c. The action will prosper because anyone of the co-owners may sue for ejectment.

Q. What is the status of the sale of the whole property by one co-owner?

a. Valid sale as to the whole property.

b. Valid sale only as to the share of the seller co-owner.

c. Sale is void on whole property as there is no consent from the other co-owner.

d. Unenforceable

  • b. Valid sale only as to the share of the seller co-owner.

Q. Which of the following is false with regard to the prescription on action to quiet title?

a. If the plaintiff is in possession, the action to quiet title does not prescribe.

b. If the plaintiff is not in possession, it may prescribe.

c. Whether the plaintiff is in possession or not, the action to quiet title will prescribe.

d. none

  • c. Whether the plaintiff is in possession or not, the action to quiet title will prescribe.

Q. What should a co-owner do inorder that he can recover expenses in the alteration of co-ownership?

a. Not secure the consent of the other co-owners anyway it is for the benefit of the co-ownership.

b. Secure a unanimous consent of the co-owners.

c. Not secure consent of the co-owners since they did not contribute for the alteration of the property.

d. Secure the consent of majority of the co-owners.

  • b. Secure a unanimous consent of the co-owners.

Q. The following are some of the characteristics of a co-ownership except one:

a. A co-owner is in a sense a trustee for the other co-owners.

b. Co-ownership has judicial personality.

c. There must be more than one subject or owner.

d. Regarding the physical whole, each co-owner must respect each other in the common use, enjoyment or preservation of the physical whole.

  • b. Co-ownership has judicial personality.

Q. A, B and C inherited a real property from their father. Subsequently, knowing that he is the co-owner of the said property, A mortgaged the same to D. For failure to pay, D foreclosed the same.

a. B and C can redeem the said property after paying the foreclosed amount.

b. A should pay B and C corresponding to the value of their respective share.

c. B and C may redeem the property only to the extent of their respective shares.

d. none

  • c. B and C may redeem the property only to the extent of their respective shares.

Q. A, B, and C are co-owners of a parcel of land. A sells his aliquot part of the whole property without the consent of B and C. Is the sale valid?

a. Yes, it is valid, because the right of alienation is one of his rights over the ideal shares in the co-ownership.

b. No, it is invalid, because the consent of his co-owners is material for the sale to be valid.

c. Yes, it is valid because the co-owners did not object when he sold his part.

d. No, it is invalid because a co-owner cannot sell his part to third person without offering it first to his co-owners.

  • a. Yes, it is valid, because the right of alienation is one of his rights over the ideal shares in the co-ownership.

Q. Which of the following is a characteristic of a co-ownership?

a. The co-ownership possess juridical personality.

b. Regarding the ideal share, each co-owner does not hold any control over the same.

c. A co-owner is in a sense a trustee for the other co-owner.

d. Regarding the physical whole, a co-owner uses and enjoys the same to the exclusion of the others.

  • c. A co-owner is in a sense a trustee for the other co-owner.

Q. Which of the following is not a ground for extinguishment of a usufruct?

a. Prescription

b. Bad use of the thing in usufruct.

c. Total loss of the thing in usufruct

d. Non-user for 6 months.

  • b. Bad use of the thing in usufruct.

Q. In taking care of the thing in usufruct, what degree of diligence is required?

a. Good father of a family

b. Utmost diligence

c. Ordinary diligence

d. Extraordinary diligence

  • a. Good father of a family

Q. In 2001, A granted a usufruct over his building to B until February 23, 2011 when C, the son of B would have reached the age of 25. C died at the age of 23 in 2009. What happened to the usufruct?

a. The usufruct was extinguished;

b. The death terminated the usufruct;

c. The usufruct subsists because a usufruct granted for the time that may elapse before a third person reaches a certain age shall subsist for a number of years specified even if the third person should die unless there is a stipulation to the contrary (Art. 606, NCC)

d. The usufruct continues because B, the trustee is still alive.

  • c. The usufruct subsists because a usufruct granted for the time that may elapse before a third person reaches a certain age shall subsist for a number of years specified even if the third person should die unless there is a stipulation to the contrary (Art. 606, NCC)

Q. A built his house on his lot up to the boundary line and opened windows with direct view over the lot of B. Twenty (20) years later, B built his house up to the boundary line of his lot, hence, A filed a complaint enjoining B from building his house up to the boundary contending that he has acquired the easement of light and view by prescription and that B cannot build less than 3 meters from the boundary. Is A correct?

a. Yes, because of prescription and laches;

b. No, because there was no formal prohibition by means of an instrument acknowledged before a notary public prohibiting B from obstructing his easement of light and view;

c. No, because A did not observe the 2-meter distance between the windows since the view is direct and the lot of B (Non-observance of the distances does not give rise to prescription.)

d. Both B and C.

  • d. Both B and C.

Q. A tolerated B to use his land, hence, B constructed a road where his trucks would pass through, going in and out of his land. Fifty (50) years thereafter, A asked B to pay rentals but B refused contending that he has already acquired ownership over the easement of right of way by prescription. Is B correct?

a. B is correct because possession of a parcel of land for ten (10) years in good faith will ripen to ownership.

b. B is correct because of laches.

c. B is wrong because an easement of right of way cannot be acquired by prescription as while it is apparent it is not however not continuous.

d. B is correct because with the continuous use of the easement, prescription lie

  • c. B is wrong because an easement of right of way cannot be acquired by prescription as while it is apparent it is not however not continuous.
Subscribe Now

Get All Updates & News